Since WWII no one has been elected President without the approval of the Military-Industrial-Financial Combine. If I was a betting man, I would go with STAY OBAMA. The "they" was prepared to ignore his financial-domestic issues managment skills, the behind-the-scenses mechanics would handle those. But his unlikability & public ackwardness along with the foriegn policy naviete spell difficulties about his ability to manage the job. Obama is broken in, period!
Three threatening crisises at once, North Korea, Iran, and Syria.
and the right claims the USA is not an empire. Why are these all our problem? Unless we are the policeman of the entire world..
No one comes into office apprenticed or prepared to deal with the USA's foreign mess.
Obama has done well, dealing with what he inherited:
(Iraq, Iran, North Korea, world economic crisis, energy, Afghanistan, war on terror)
and now has a full plate of stuff that started once he got into office:
(Arab Spring, Syria
I believe he truly wants to keep the US out of war. Romney leaves me with doubts of indecisiveness and I question who would make up his foreign policy group. They seem bend on having another war. On the other hand, under Hillary's direct control the USA has
Managing a successful effort that resulted in Iran pulling back from going nuclear
Rallying China to get North Korea to pull back from weapons development
Isolating Chavez
Getting Russia not to invade Ukraine
Working with the government of Afghanistan to get them to work together with us to save their own butts
Ultimately, the American people must be made aware of this and its consequences, for this is the supreme decision that will be decided in November
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment