LET'S SEE IF I GET THIS STRAIGHT -

A republican administration requests nearly a trillion $ to bail out the banks - the republican congress voted against it in mass - now a Democratic administration wants to charge the banks a fee to recover the $ and the republicans in congress are opposed to the fee. They didn't want to give the banks any money initially and now they don't want it back. Who really represents WALL STREET.

The new logic -

since when does letting a tax cut expire become a tax increase - especially when its a marginal tax rate change. I'm tired of hearing that the rich are going to be driven into the poor house. Keep in mind it only applies to income in excess of $250,000.

CORPORATE TAX RATES ARE JUST TOO HIGH

HERE IN THE UNITED STATES - AFTER ALL GOLDMAN SACKS HAD TO PAY AN EFFECTIVE TAX RATE RATE FOR 2008 OF JUST 1%.

WHAT HAVE THE REPUBLICANS OFFERED

ASIDE FROM 'NO'?

IN AMERICA WE HAVE A CORPORATE

ONE PARTY SYSTEM - AN EXTREME RIGHT WING BRANCH, A CENTER-RIGHT BRANCH, AND AN INEFFECTIVE MODERATELY LIBERAL BRANCH.

THIS JUST IN - GEORGE BUSH WAS NOT

PRESIDENT ON SEPTERMBER 11, 2001. DESPITE BEING ELECTED PRESIDENT IN NOVEMBER 2008 AND SWORN IN JANUARY 20, 2001, BILL CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT UNTIL NOON ON SEPTEMBER 11. DO REPUBLICAN APOLOGISTS THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID - APPARENTLY SO.

HOW IS IT THAT GERMANY IS THE WORLD'S

NUMBER ONE EXPORTER? WITH THEIR HIGH LABOR COST AND EXPENSIVE SOCIAL SERVICES, YET CHINA WITH THE LOWEST COSTS IS ONLY NUMBER TWO. THE USA RANKS THIRD. MY OH MY HOW CAN THIS BE?